The editorial process at TK TechForum Journal is meticulously designed to uphold the highest standards of scholarly publishing, ensuring that each manuscript is evaluated rigorously, fairly, and transparently. As a single-blind peer-reviewed journal, our process is structured to protect the integrity of the review while fostering constructive feedback and critical analysis of the submitted work. In this system, while the reviewers remain anonymous to the authors, the reviewers are aware of the identities of the authors, a practice that allows for informed and expert assessment of the content.
Upon submission of a manuscript to TK TechForum Journal, the editorial team conducts an initial screening to determine whether the submission aligns with the journal’s scope and meets the basic quality standards required for further review. This initial evaluation includes a check for originality, relevance to the field, adherence to submission guidelines, and overall scientific merit. Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria are promptly returned to the authors with feedback, allowing them the opportunity to improve their work or consider other publication venues.
For manuscripts that pass this preliminary assessment, the next step involves assigning the submission to a subject-specific editor. This editor is selected based on their expertise in the topic area of the manuscript, ensuring that the manuscript is reviewed by individuals with the appropriate background and knowledge. The editor plays a critical role in the review process, as they are responsible for identifying and inviting reviewers who are recognized experts in the field relevant to the manuscript. This careful selection of reviewers is vital to maintaining the high standards of the journal, as these experts provide the specialized insights necessary for a thorough and accurate evaluation of the work.
Once the manuscript is in the hands of the selected reviewers, the single-blind review process begins. Reviewers are asked to assess the manuscript based on several key criteria, including the originality of the research, the soundness of the methodology, the clarity of the writing, the relevance and accuracy of the literature review, and the significance of the findings to the field of study. Reviewers are also encouraged to provide constructive feedback that can help authors improve their work, whether or not the manuscript is ultimately accepted for publication. This feedback is intended to be detailed and specific, addressing both strengths and areas for improvement.
The recommendations made by the reviewers—whether to accept the manuscript, request revisions, or reject it—are taken very seriously by the editorial team. The editor responsible for the manuscript carefully considers the reviewers’ comments and weighs them alongside their own expertise before making a final decision. In cases where the reviewers’ opinions diverge, the editor may seek additional reviews or engage in further deliberation to reach a consensus.
If revisions are recommended, the authors are given the opportunity to respond to the reviewers’ comments and make the necessary changes to their manuscript. The revised manuscript is often sent back to the original reviewers for a second round of evaluation, ensuring that the revisions satisfactorily address the concerns raised during the initial review. This iterative process may continue until the manuscript meets the journal’s standards for publication.
Throughout the entire editorial process, the TK TechForum Journal editorial team is committed to maintaining open and transparent communication with the authors. Authors are kept informed of the status of their submission at each stage, from initial submission to final decision. This transparency is a key aspect of our commitment to fairness and helps to build trust between authors and the journal.
Moreover, TK TechForum Journal is dedicated to conducting the review process in a timely manner. On average, the review process is completed within 10 weeks, balancing the need for thorough, high-quality reviews with the authors’ desire for prompt publication. This commitment to timely reviews is part of our broader mission to facilitate the rapid dissemination of important research findings, ensuring that new knowledge can be shared with the global academic community as quickly as possible.
In summary, the editorial process at TK TechForum Journal is a robust and carefully managed system designed to ensure the publication of high-quality research. By employing a single-blind review process, selecting expert reviewers, and maintaining clear communication with authors, the journal upholds the highest standards of scholarly publishing. Our goal is to support the advancement of knowledge in the field of technology and related disciplines while providing a fair, transparent, and efficient pathway to publication for researchers around the world.