ON THIS PAGE

Rating-Constrained Super-Rated Capture in Hydrostatic Wind Turbines with Integrated Mechanical Storage

Iftikhar Ahmad1, Naveed Ahmad1
1University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF), Burewala Campus, 61010, Pakistan

Abstract

Hydrostatic wind-turbine drives with mechanical storage can decouple rotor power extraction from generator power transmission, providing a chance to reclaim power that otherwise gets rejected during above-rated operation. In particular, the issue investigated herein concerns what extent of super-rating of the hydrostatic turbine is appropriate relative to increasing hydraulic rating and blade loads before the latter effects outweigh the annual power benefit in delivered electricity. As a specific example, the 5 MW NREL Class I reference turbine model will be considered in four modes of operation – geared conversion, hydrostatic conversion without super-rating, fully super-rated hydrostatic storage, and hydrostatic storage super-rated under a certain cap – using stated generator, gearbox, hydraulic, and mechanical efficiencies; a Class I Rayleigh distribution of wind speeds with a mean wind speed of 10 m/s; and outputting average delivered power, capacity factor, maximum rotor power, maximum hydraulic pump rating, and maximum blade bending moment. A capture-return efficiency ratio is defined to relate the average power increase due to super-rating to additional hydraulic rating, subject to the requirement that the blade bending remains unchanged – thus ensuring that energetic and mechanical effects cannot be considered independently. The non-super-rated configuration involving hydraulic drive decreases average power from 2.67 MW to 2.34 MW due to uncompensated transmission losses. Fully super-rating the turbine produces an average power of 3.28 MW and a capacity factor of 66% while needing 15.7 MW of pump rating and increasing maximum blade bending from 10.52 MN-m to 10.58 MN-m. Capping the super-rating at a pump rating of 10.3 MW reduces maximum blade bending to 10.52 MN-m and yields an average power of 3.13 MW, a yearly power output of 27.42 GWh and a capacity factor of 63%. Results reveal that capped super-rating produces an 84.0% recovery in the super-rating power gain, yet uses just 48.1% of the additional pump power needed by super-rating.

Keywords: wind energy; hydrostatic drivetrain; mechanical storage; super-rated operation; hydraulic pump sizing; NREL 5 MW turbine; capacity factor; blade bending moment
Citation
Iftikhar Ahmad, Naveed Ahmad. Rating-Constrained Super-Rated Capture in Hydrostatic Wind Turbines with Integrated Mechanical Storage[J], TK Techforum Journal (ThyssenKrupp Techforum), Volume 2022 (3). 76-91.

Related Articles

Joseph Bentsman1
1Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
S. Sheyko1, O. Hrechanyi1, T. Vasilchenko1, A. Hrechana2
1Department of Metallurgical Equipment, Zaporizhzhia National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
2Scientific Laboratory of the Latest Technologies, Educational and Scientific Production Center “Metalspetsproekt,” Zaporizhzhia National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine